DMDS Exhibit Showcases Sierra Smith, Photographer

Come to the DMDS to see the photographs of Sierra Smith, Journalism, ’14. This video highlights most of the photographs in the show. Curated by DMDS co-op Abigail Ochse, Digital Arts, ’12, this exhibit displays an expressive potpourri of vibrant images covering a range of subjects. Regarding her creativity, Sierra Smith wrote: “I don’t know if I’ve been working long enough to develop a style, but my work does tend toward the artistic, rather than the journalistic. It’s often fairly colorful, too. Though I would say I’m pleased with my portfolio, it’s been mostly limited by my camera; I’ve been using the same one for years, and it’s not exactly something a photographer would flaunt. Because of its quality, my work is often narrowed into a single style. However, it also forces me to compensate by looking for things that another photographer with better equipment may not see. While he’s letting the camera dictate his photograph, I’m letting my artistic vision do the honor.” Come see the show in person through the summer. If you are interested in exhibiting your work in the DMDS next fall, please contact Debra Mandel

Researchers: Share your views on open access publishing

I received this announcement today on a listserv I belong to. The Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP) seeks to gain insight into researchers’ views and experiences on open access publishing through your completion of a brief survey. Although sponsored by the European Commission, SOAP is seeking respondents from all parts of the world (and at all stages of their careers). Here is the message they sent:
The SOAP Project (*), funded by the European Commission, would like to announce the release of an online survey to assess researchers’ experiences with open access publishing. This survey aims to inform the most comprehensive analysis of attitudes to open access publishing to date and is seeking views from a wide a range of interested parties. It is primarily aimed at active researchers in public and private organizations, from all fields of the research in the sciences and humanities and focuses on publication of research articles in (open access) peer-reviewed journals. If you would like to contribute to shaping the public discourse on open access, please visit: http://surveymonkey.com/soap_survey_d It should take 10-15 minutes to complete. The survey outcome will be made public and the resulting insights as well as recommendations will be openly shared with the European Commission, publishers, research funding agencies, libraries and researchers. Thanks in advance, the SOAP Project Team info@project-soap.eu (*) Note: The SOAP consortium is coordinated by CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. It represents key stakeholders in open access, such as publishers BioMed Central, SAGE and Springer; funding agencies (the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council) and libraries (the Max Planck Digital Library of the Max Planck Society). The project runs for two years, from March 2009 to February 2011.

Mechanical Engineering students’ capstone project cited in Wired.com article

On March 9, 2010, the popular website Wired.com published an article titled “Mile-High Mega Kites Could Pull Giant, Floating Power Plants,” by author Alexis Madrigal. Madrigal cited the work of six NU students, and included a link to their capstone project, which had been published in IRis, Northeastern’s digital archive of scholarship. In the past 2 months, their capstone project, “Hydroelectric Power Generator: Technical Design Report,” which the students created in the course MIME1501 in May 2002, has been viewed 350 times by readers of the Wired article. Congratulations to student authors Anthony Chesna, Tony DiBella, Tim Hutchins, Saralyn Kropf, Jeff Lesica, and Jim Mahoney! Want to increase your citation rate? Submit your work to IRis!

McChesney and Nichols Article: should Uncle Sam save public media with huge cash infusion?

Bob McChesney and John Nichols came to speak at Northeastern in January about “The Death and Life of American Journalism,” as their new book is titled. McChesney and Nichol’s basic argument is that the media establishment in this country is in desperate need of greater public funding if journalism is to survive as a sophisticated, investigative and intelligent medium not solely beholden to corporate power. This article posted on their website arstechnica.com lays out the financial complications of doing so, while laying out a few strategies that have been used to effect in Europe and could possibly be adapted here. My own opinion? We could do well to gain further subsidies for journalism through a gradual tax increase in certain areas. But more money does not necessarily equal more civic engagement. We must also be aware that the government has the potential to act as deadly as any corporation; money could easily be withdrawn from news organizations that are too critical of the current government, for instance. The common American wisdom is that government is bad and corporations are the life-blood of our economy. This article poses something different, in a fairly moderate position. Here is the link. http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/should-uncle-sam-save-public-media-with-huge-cash-infusion.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss Please share your thoughts on government, media, money and all other related topics.

Reserves for Summer 2 due on May 31

Attention faculty! If you have required or suggested readings you’d like us to put on reserve for your Summer II class, please get them to us by May 31.  Use myNEU (click the “Library” tab) to make a request. For questions, see our Course Reserves page.